Rhode Island

Disclosing All Property When Filing Bankruptcy

In Rhode Island, are you required to disclose all of your property when filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy?

In a word: Yes.

A Chapter 7 Bankruptcy exists to protect you and your property. However, to receive a discharge of debt, you must disclose all of your assets.

During the bankruptcy process, a debtor will be asked if he is telling the truth. Bankruptcy lawyers will even use the phrase “under penalty of perjury” to remind a client that hiding assets is a violation of federal bankruptcy law punishable by jail.

You see, under Rhode Island bankruptcy law, it makes no difference if:

Your property came as a gift or through inheritance
Someone else paid for it
It is easily hidden and there is no paper trail

Your bankruptcy petition must fully list all of your property.

Understand that the US Trustee has many tools to discover hidden assets. Even calls from “anonymous tipsters” help trustees make sure that a debtor is not attempting to conceal assets.

Disclosing all property to your bankruptcy lawyer is actually in a debtor’s own best interest. Telling your lawyer the complete truth will help him protect you and your property.

Common property interests that require complete disclosure in your Rhode Island bankruptcy petition:

Any claims you have for money, including personal injury claims and potential lawsuits
Gifts you may have received
Assets you disposed of in the last 4 years
Possible inheritance interests after someone has died
Bank accounts/ real estate owned by parents with your name on it
Property you may receive in a divorce settlement
Personal debts owed to you by a friend or family member

Most who file bankruptcy are honest, hardworking people who have run out of options. Having a debtor list all his property in a bankruptcy petition makes the system fair for everyone.

Bottom line: your bankruptcy petition must be complete, accurate, and truthful. Don’t leave out any property.

RI Bankruptcy Law: Median Income Figures Change Again

RI bankruptcy lawyers have new income guidelines to determine who qualifies for Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief. On November 1, 2012, the US Census figures became effective for all new consumer bankruptcy filings. Other than for 3-person households, it became slightly more difficult to qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief for every other household size in Rhode Island.

Below are the median income figures that I use for my Rhode Island clients who need to file for bankruptcy protection:

1 person household $ 45,945 (down from $ 47,798)
2 person household $ 60,538 (down from $ 61,506)
3 person household $ 75,306 (up from $ 68,909)
4 person household $ 82,086 (down from $ 88,990)
Add $ 7,500 for each additional household member above a 4 person household

As a reminder, these are gross income figures. To determine whether you qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief, we take your trailing 6 months of gross income from all sources (except Social Security and unemployment benefits), multiply it by two and then compare it to the chart above.

While its easier to qualify for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy with gross income lower than the median, in many cases, you may still qualify with income slightly higher than the median.

Bottom line: Its impossible to forecast whether it will become easier or more difficult to file your Chapter 7 case in the future. Even if you are not ready to file your case now, I can run an analysis on your family’s income to see if your income is presently low enough to qualify for debt relief.

Top 7 Reasons To File Chapter 7 vs Chapter 13

The US Bankruptcy Code provides a number of choices to people struggling with debt. The most popular choice is to file a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy petition. Here are seven reasons why.

Time—A normal Chapter 7 bankruptcy case takes about 100 days from beginning to end. After a brief creditor’s meeting one month into the process, the case ends two months later.
Property—Because federal and/or State exemption laws allow a debtor to protect their assets, most Chapter 7 filers do not lose any property. The bankruptcy trustee handles most cases as “no asset” cases, meaning that the debtor is not required to forfeit any property.
Cost—Filing under Chapter 7 is considerable cheaper than filing under Chapter 13. Even though lawyer fees may differ from state to state, most bankruptcy attorneys will quote a fee that is fair and affordable. Bankruptcy lawyers who practice exclusively in bankruptcy (not general practitioners) understand you don’t have extra money to overpay for their services.
Repayment—You are not required to repay unsecured non-priority creditors like credit cards, utility bills, personal loans, or medical bills. If you created your debt in good faith and no creditor objects to your bankruptcy, most unsecured credit obligations will be destroyed in your bankruptcy.
Privacy—Record of your bankruptcy is only accessible in the court system. In most cases, the only people who will know you filed for bankruptcy protection are you, the court, and your creditors.
Credit—Most people who file under Chapter 7 can reestablish credit shortly after their bankruptcy concludes. (Your debt to income ratio improves once your debt has been eliminated: the first step towards rebuilding your credit.)
Stress—Most chapter 7 filers never set foot in a courtroom. Instead, they merely attend a brief, informal hearing with the trustee assigned to their case.

The Truth About the Mortgage Modification Process

Obama’s mortgage modification program: on its way out?

Could the Obama Administration’s program to help American homeowners stay afloat be nearing the end of its usefulness? A committee of Washington Republicans assigned to oversee White House programs says this could be the case.

Soon after it became obvious that a major national financial crisis was looming on the horizon, the Obama Administration launched its Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), offering mortgage lenders financial incentive to restructure their customers’ payment plans. Although optimists predicted this program would stem the tide of sub-prime mortgage failures, it only ended up being temporarily effective: confusing paperwork, uninformed staffs, and poorly organized processes hopelessly confounded a large number of participants, many of whom ultimately failed to acquire long-term mortgage modification.

Newly elected Republican officials are expected to study and scrutinize many of the President’s recession-protection strategies, and thanks to its less-than-stellar performance, HAMP will probably make an easy target. “This program seems to have outlived its usefulness,” stated Darell Issa of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. In Issa’s opinion, the incentive program is yet another example of superfluous government intervention.

This allegation is not entirely without basis in reality. Although hopes ran high for HAMP, in truth the entire program was rushed and poorly planned from the beginning. Of the 500,000 homeowners granted temporary mortgage modifications under HAMP, only a miniscule fraction was approved for permanent modifications. In the long run, this left many further behind on their mortgage than they began.

Additionally, recent unemployment rates have been less than conducive for HAMP’s success. In recent years it has become impossible for much of the country to attain income levels capable of handling modified mortgages, let alone unadjusted ones.

The fact that HAMP has been associated with the robo-signing controversy only compounds problems. Republicans now blame Democratic regulators for not paying close enough attention to the foreclosure industry. Representative Robert Goodlatte is quoted in a recent hearing on Capitol Hill as demanding Democrats to “explain how the OCC [the agency in charge of overseeing the activity of America’s largest banks] …failed to detect that there were foreclosure documentation issues well before this turned into a crisis.”

Julie Williams, Chief counsel for the OCC, had little to say in response: “In hindsight, if we think about the volume of transactions that were going through the process, we could have been more suspicious.”

RI Bankruptcy Advice: Tell the Truth

Your Duties to Disclose During Bankruptcy

A successful Chapter 7 bankruptcy requires honesty in order to work. When filing for bankruptcy in Rhode Island (or any state for that matter), honesty is not just necessary: it is mandatory. Anyone filing for bankruptcy should know that they are expected—required, rather—to act in good faith and be completely transparent with their RI bankruptcy attorney and Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee.

There are three areas in particular where this “duty to disclose” comes into play for those filing for bankruptcy.

(1) Duty to Disclose Pre-Bankruptcy Asset Transfers

Imagine you own a number of expensive assets (real estate, valuable jewelry, multiple cars, perhaps a boat) but have created considerable debt in acquiring them. Scared that you may lose something, you secretly transfer these items to a close relative before filing for bankruptcy, with the intent of taking them back after your debt has been eliminated. This would be considered fraud under bankruptcy law and could be grounds for the denial of your debt discharge. For this reason, you are required to alert your attorney of any and all transfers of interest in the period before you filed for bankruptcy.

(2) Duty to Disclose Payments Made Before Your Bankruptcy

You may or may not have been advised to avoid repaying loans to family and friends prior to filing for bankruptcy. This is partially because of your “duty to disclose” pre-bankruptcy payments, since repaying loans from family and friends in this context can also be considered as fraudulent. In repaying old debts, you have chosen a lesser priority “creditor” over another higher-priority creditor, an action that can have serious repercussions in bankruptcy court. For this reason, any pre-bankruptcy payments beyond what bankruptcy court considers “essential” must be disclosed to one’s bankruptcy attorney.

(3) Duty to Disclose Any Lawsuits

Your “duty to disclose” extends to payments you expect to receive as well. If you are currently involved in a lawsuit from which you expect to receive some form of financial settlement or compensation, you have an obligation to alert your bankruptcy attorney of your situation.

Bankruptcy is a complicated business, so consulting a qualified bankruptcy attorney is an intelligent move for any person struggling with excessive debt. A good bankruptcy attorney can help you make sense of bankruptcy law’s complex procedures and make the most of a difficult financial situation. The Law Offices of Mark Buckley offer free debt consultation and are a good place to start when looking for financial direction.